Cases 1 - 10 of 29
(PC) Morgan v. Davies et al
as 2:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
L. Davies, J. Hall and A. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morgan v. Davies et al
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
L. Davies, J. Hall and A. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onofre Serrano v. R. Bar et al
as 2:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Onofre Tommy Serrano
Defendant:
R. Bar, Casey Charles Mulholland, D Angelo Jerome Darby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morgan v. Espinoza et al
as 2:2023cv01955
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
A. Espinoza, L. Davies and J. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morgan v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
Jeffery Macomber, J. Hall, L. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) McGuire et al v. Roseville Joint Union High School District et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Desiree McGuire and Cadence DeVault
Defendant:
Roseville Joint Union High School District, John Becker, Andrew Tagg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Frank Falat v. Rodney Cyril Sacks et al
as 8:2020cv01782
Defendant:
Guy P. Carling, Kathleen E. Ciaramello, Sydney Selati and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Falat
Hall, et al., v. City of Weed et al
as 2:2020cv01789
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Hall and Jeannette Hall
Defendant:
City of Weed and John Gale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darling v. Gazzaniga et al
as 2:2017cv01697
Plaintiff:
T. A. Darling
Defendant:
Suzanne I. Gazzaniga, Michael A. Jacques, David M. Rutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahadi Abu-al Muhammad v. Prentice Hill et al
as 2:2017cv01137
Defendant:
L. Abma, S. Adkins, J. Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Ahadi Abu-Al Muhammad
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
