Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Cantu v. Moore
as 1:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Marco A. Cantu and Marco Alberto Cantu
Defendant:
J. Michael Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Ferguson et al
as 4:2021cv04246
Plaintiff:
Ralph W. Rogers, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Michael Ferguson, Judge Tom Lowe, Rattikin Title Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 3:2020cv01131
Plaintiff:
J Michael Moore, Laurie Moore, Laurie A. Moore and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byrne v. Young et al
as 4:2019cv01949
Defendant:
J Michael Ragan, Michael K Young and John Doe Texas A&M University Police Officers #1-4
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Byrne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Moore et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 3:2019cv00842
Plaintiff:
J. Michael Moore, Laurie Moore, Laurie A. Moore and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mugg v. Hutmacher
as 1:2018cv00732
Defendant:
Lone Star Tangible Assets, L.P., J. Michael Buckley, Hut Family, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Mugg
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Padron v. Stapleton
as 3:2018cv01151
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Alfonso Padron
Defendant:
J Michael Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. S & F Funding LLC., et al; et al
as 4:2017cv03780
Plaintiff:
Ralph W Rogers, Sr
Defendant:
S & F Funding LLC., et al, J Michael Ferguson and Tom Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. The Travelers Indemnity Company
as 4:2017cv00422
Petitioner:
J. Michael Ferguson
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson v. The Travelers Indemnity Company
as 3:2017cv01331
Petitioner:
J. Michael Ferguson
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
