Cases 1 - 10 of 18
DENT v. PARISI et al
as 5:2023cv02675
Petitioner:
ROBERT WILSON DENT
Respondent:
THOMAS G. PARISI, ELLEN R. WEST, TIMOTHY J. MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DENT v. MORRIS et al
as 5:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILSON DENT
Defendant:
TIMOTHY J. MORRIS, DARREN SMITH, YISLEIDY D. MINAYA-VARGAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01745
Plaintiff:
Alton D Brown
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Daniel Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. GILL et al
as 2:2017cv00546
Plaintiff:
AARON VAUGHN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILL, S.C .I. GREENE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILL AND HIS CO-WORKERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STORY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01241
Plaintiff:
STANTON STORY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DORINA VARNER, KERRI MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SPEARMAN v. NICKELOS et al
as 2:2015cv00142
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL MOSES SPEARMAN
Defendant:
D. NICKELOS, WILSON, K. THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPEARMAN v. MORRIS et al
as 2:2014cv01751
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL MOSES SPEARMAN
Defendant:
A. J. MORRIS and W. HOLLOWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. American National Insurance Corporation
as 4:2013cv02236
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Morris
Defendant:
American National Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOLD v. DE HONT et al
as 2:2013cv03948
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND GOLD
Defendant:
RAYMOND J. DE HONT , MICHAEL J. MORRIS , JUDITH A. SPIRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
MORRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv49884
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. MORRIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
