Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hendrix Smith v. J. P. Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2022cv05116
Plaintiff:
Edgina T. Hendrix Smith
Defendant:
J. P. Morgan Chase Bank and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28:l332 Diversity - Foreclosure
Fisher et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
John T. Fisher, III, Annie S. Fisher, Sara D. Murray and others
Defendant:
Abner Smith, Jonathan Kasper, Dana Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Hendrix-Smith v. J P Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2019cv03832
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and J P Morgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff:
Edgina Hendrix-Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 7:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ghee v. J. P. Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2017cv03115
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ghee
Defendant:
J. P. Morgan Chase Bank , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Brochstein & Bentley, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BATES v. J P MORGAN CHASE BANK N A
as 4:2012cv00043
Plaintiff:
SHAWNA BATES
Defendant:
J P MORGAN CHASE BANK N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Comer v. J P Morgan Chase Bank, N A
as 4:2011cv00088
Plaintiff:
MELANIE COMER
Defendant:
J P MORGAN CHASE BANK N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
