Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Martinez v. Allison et al
as 5:2023cv04863
Plaintiff:
Adam Martinez
Defendant:
K Allison, J. Robertson, L. Deters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chagolla v. Schrag et al
as 4:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Raymundo J. Chagolla
Defendant:
J. Schrag, J. Robertson, J. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rommel Querol v. Richards, et al
as 22-16343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMMEL QUEROL
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARDS, C.O., A. SMITH, D. BELL and others
Todd Ashker v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 22-16162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, SCOTT KERNAN, GEORGE GIURBINO and others
Querol v. Richards et al
as 1:2022cv01800
Plaintiff:
Rommel Querol
Defendant:
C/O Richards, A. Smith, D. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
(PC) Ashker v. Beard et al
as 1:2021cv01611
Plaintiff:
Todd Ashker
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Scott Kernan, George Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hull v. Sunshine Valley Health Care - Wesley J. Robertson M.D. Prof. Corp. et al
as 2:2021cv01350
Plaintiff:
Amber Hull
Defendant:
Sunshine Valley Health Care - Wesley J. Robertson M.D. Prof. Corp. and Wesley Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lawrence Denard v. J. Robertson
as 21-15610
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAWRENCE DENARD
Respondent / Appellee:
J. ROBERTSON
Charles Cathy v. Kuzmicz, et al
as 21-15524
Defendant / Appellee:
W. REYNOLDS, Prison Litigation Official, Pelican Bay State Prison, K. HOOD, Mailroom Official, Pelican Bay State Prison, J. ROBERTSON, Warden, Pelican Bay State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES RAY CATHY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
