Cases 1 - 10 of 6,255
BWXT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS GROUP, INC. v. J & L HATFIELD, LLC d/b/a RUSACH INTERNATIONAL et al
as 1:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
BWXT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
J & L HATFIELD, LLC d/b/a RUSACH INTERNATIONAL, JEFFREY HATFIELD and LOIS ANN HATFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WETTER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
DEIDRA WETTER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WYATT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA W. WYATT
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
EVERAGE v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EVERAGE
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, SAMUEL J. BYRD, LEE ANN MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
W.S. v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
N. S. W.S.
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
S. v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
J. S. S.
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CIMBALNIK v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
SHANE P. CIMBALNIK
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HENSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORR. et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
JARED MALACHI HENSON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORR., STEVEN JACKSON, LISA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
MISTY S. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FAUVERGUE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
NANCY J. FAUVERGUE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
