Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Toson v. Smythe et al
as 1:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Durand Toson
Defendant:
Matthew T Smythe, Thaddeus J Porter, Terroll Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Gonzale et al
as 3:2021cv02505
Plaintiff:
Princess J Anderson and Glenn Anderson
Defendant:
Alberto Martinez Gonzale and Fortunato Hernandez Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Black et al
as 3:2017cv03068
Plaintiff:
Temple J Anderson
Defendant:
Wency Black, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Bruce Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldston v. City of Fort Worth et al
as 4:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Regina Goldston
Defendant:
Bruce J Anderson , Sara Straten and City of Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv03327
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Harold J Anderson and Linda Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Shelton v. Anderson et al
as 2:2015cv00157
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Marks Shelton
Defendant:
J Anderson, Raymond C Pickard, Terry D Rains and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Regency Quality Construction Company et al
as 3:2014cv01485
Plaintiff:
Terry Green
Defendant:
Regency Quality Construction Company and Elizabeth J. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
White v. Texas Department of Public Safety et al
as 4:2008cv00619
Plaintiff:
Judith Ann White
Defendant:
Texas Department of Public Safety and J. Anderson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
