Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Brandon Crosby v. Carl Manis
as 23-7035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON LUIS CROSBY
Defendant / Appellee:
CARL MANIS, RICK WHITE, CHRISTOPHER KING and others
Defendant:
DOUGLAS BARTON, SERGEANT ALLEN and JOHN DOE
Crosby v. Manis et al
as 7:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Brandon Luis Crosby
Defendant:
Carl Manis, Rick White, Christopher King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Clark et al
as 3:2021cv00761
Plaintiff:
Alterik J. Baker
Defendant:
Megan L. Clark, Michael J. Hallahan, II and Preston G. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Williams et al
as 2:2021cv00503
Plaintiff:
Malik Allen
Defendant:
Williams, Ms. Burrell and J. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Moon et al
as 7:2019cv00798
Defendant:
Officer J. Baker, U.S. Judge Norman Moon, K. Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Cottrell v. Harold Clarke
as 14-7600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER EARL COTTRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA Department of Corrections, EDDIE PEARSON, Former Warden of Sussex I Prison, VDOC, DAVID EVERETT, Regional Director, Eastern Office, VDOC and others
Cottrell v. Clarke et al
as 3:2013cv00501
Plaintiff:
Christopher Earl Cottrell
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Eddie Pearson, David Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence Johnson v. T. O'Brien
as 12-6110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
T. O'BRIEN, Warden, CAPTAIN WILSON, LIEUTENANT TREES and others
Lawrence Johnson v. T. O'Brien
as 11-6888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
T. O'BRIEN, Warden, CAPTAIN WILSON, LIEUTENANT TREES and others
Lawrence Johnson v. T. O'Brien
as 11-6779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
T. O'BRIEN, Warden, CAPTAIN WILSON, LIEUTENANT TREES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
