Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Baker v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Sara J. Baker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BAKER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv07060
Plaintiff:
SHERA J. BAKER
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marshall v. Baker et al
as 3:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Shawn Marshall
Defendant:
J Baker and Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Sara J. Baker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MCDANIELS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv00238
Defendant:
J. BAKER, SMITH and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANTHONY MCDANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 2:2016cv00007
Defendant:
ATEBERRY, J BAKER, MAYOR BALLARD and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BAKER et al
as 2:2012cv00115
Defendant:
J. BAKER, LINDA VANNETTA and MICHAEL R. WARD
Plaintiff:
ROY AUSTIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER et al v. OBSIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2010mc00139
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. BAKER and WADE R. WOLF
Defendant:
TIMOTHY S. DURHAM and OBSIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC.
BAKER et al v. OBSIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2010mc00049
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. BAKER and WADE R. WOLF
Defendant:
TIMOTHY S. DURHAM and OBSIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC.
SAYLES v. TRUSTY et al
as 2:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. SAYLES
Defendant:
JAMIE TRUSTY, J KETCHEM, J BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
