Cases 1 - 10 of 14
(PC) Webber v. Barrios et al
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Doyal Webber
Defendant:
J. Barrios, J. Ervin, P. Liamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Edwards v. Moreno et al
as 1:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Roberto J. Edwards
Defendant:
Moreno, J. Barrios, Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Landis v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Richard Landis
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Lt. J. Barrios, S. Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Puckett v. Kelso et al
as 2:2021cv01710
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, Munoz, J. Barrios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Puckett v. Barrios et al
as 1:2020cv01405
Defendant:
A. Duran, B. Lee, K. Lopez-Maldonado and others
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pepe s Inc. v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2018cv02277
Defendant:
Bessine L. Richard, Mark Scott, James L. Mulvihill and others
Plaintiff:
Pepe's Inc. dba Pepe's Towing, PePe s, Inc. and PePe s, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Pepe s Towing
Petitioner:
Attorney Gregg W. Kettles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. Valencia et al
as 1:2017mc00016
Plaintiff:
David Daniels
Defendant:
J. Valencia, M. Owens, E. Torres and others
Peter Anaya v. Barrios et al
as 1:2016cv01750
Plaintiff:
Peter Anaya
Defendant:
J. Barrios, Shomer, Peet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Lockwood, et al.
as 1:2016cv01721
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Leroy Ward
Defendant:
Timothy M. Lockwood, Greenwall, Delao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
