Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Winding v. Jones et al
as 3:2013cv00509
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Simone Jones , R. Davis , Catherine Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Houston et al
as 3:2013cv00449
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Tonya Houston , Christopher Wansley, R. Pepper Crutcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Rutledge et al
as 3:2013cv00289
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
C. Rutledge, J. Breakfield, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Harbin et al
as 3:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
A. Harbin , C. Dykes , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Shaw et al
as 4:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
F. Shaw, R. Rice, F. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Harbin et al
as 4:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
A. Harbin, C. Dykes, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Harbin et al
as 4:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
A. Harbin, C. Dykes, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Breakfield et al
as 4:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
J. Breakfield, F. Ovalle, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00787
Plaintiff:
Cassie Lea Baker and Bailey Eugene Baker
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, BNSF Railway Company and others
Counter Defendant:
Cassie Lea Baker and Bailey Eugene Baker
Counter Claimant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
