Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BUTLER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv04587
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
DONNA J. BUTLER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RADEL v. SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2022cv04697
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RADEL
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL CARTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2020cv05340
Defendant:
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PFIZER, INC, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
LYDIA J BUTLER
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTLER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv12144
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE J. BUTLER
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERRE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TREASURY DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv03443
Plaintiff:
DUQUENE PIERRE
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TREASURY DEPARTMENT , THOMAS J. BUTLER, JR., DAVID V. CONTI, JR. and others
Cross_claimant:
DAVID DEROSA
Cross_defendant:
ROBERT BAER, THOMAS J. BUTLER, JR., BUTLER & CONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BUTLER v. PARSONS INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2014cv06238
Plaintiff:
HEATH J. BUTLER
Defendant:
PARSONS INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE CORPORATION , ROBERT W. PARSONS , JIM MCINTYRE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEVINS v. BUTLER et al
as 3:2012cv04015
Plaintiff:
AMANDA M. NEVINS
Defendant:
J. BUTLER, JOSEPH R. FUENTES and JOHN DOES, ONE OR MORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
