Cases 1 - 8 of 8
J&E Distributors Inc. v. South MS Wholesale, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00230
Defendant:
Manish Mike Kaul and South MS Wholesale, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J&E Distributors Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J. E. Borries, Inc. v. Modern American Recycling Service, Inc. (M.A.R.S.) et al
as 1:2020cv00296
Plaintiff:
J. E. Borries, Inc.
Defendant:
Modern American Recycling Service, Inc. (M.A.R.S.) and Modern American Recycling and Repair Services, L.L.C. (M.A.R.R.S.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson et al v. Weaver et al
as 3:2018cv00683
Defendant:
Craig Bell, J & E Partnership, LP, Jeffrey W. Weaver and others
Plaintiff:
Leanna Gibson and I'zden Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Krueger
as 3:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Moore
Defendant:
J E Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Manning et al v. Lakeside Park Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00294
Plaintiff:
Melissa Manning , J. E. , S. J. E. and others
Defendant:
Lakeside Park Homes, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manning et al v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00139
Plaintiff:
Melissa Manning , J. E. and S. J. E.
Defendant:
CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., DEF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Acevedo et al v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jessica Acevedo , All Plaintiffs , S. R. and others
Defendant:
CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., DEF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bracken et al v. Thor Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Lana Marie Bracken, Valeria Bond, M. B. and others
Defendant:
Thor Industries, Inc., MVP RV, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
