Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rogers et al v. Kroger Co.(THE) et al
as 2:2017cv02753
Plaintiff:
Taylor Rogers , Caleb Evans and J. J. E.
Defendant:
Kroger Co.(THE) and Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC et al
as 2:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, Kenneth R. Lister, Elizabeth Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Reed v. Ameridose, LLC
as 2:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Wanda L. Reed and J. E. Reed
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv03028
Petitioner:
Willie L. Davis
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and J. E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Six L's Packing Company, Inc. v. J. E. Beale Produce, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01132
Plaintiff:
Six L's Packing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
J. E. Beale Produce, Inc., James Eric Beale and Kattia Maria Bischoff-Beale
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
J. E. Campbell, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company
as 3:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
J. E. Campbell, Inc. and J. E. Campbell, Inc.
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bekaert Corporation v. City of Dyersburg et al
as 2:2007cv02316
Plaintiff:
Bekaert Corporation and Bekaert Corporation
Defendant:
City of Dyersburg, Dyersburg Electric System and J. E. Williamson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
