Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Glenn v. McGrath et al
as 3:2008cv03908
Plaintiff:
Otis Ray Glenn
Defendant:
Joseph McGrath, T. L. Nelson, J. G. Arceo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hash v. Cate et al
as 3:2008cv03729
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, M. S. Evans, L. E. Scribner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Higgins et al
as 2:2008cv01711
Plaintiff:
Devonte B Harris
Defendant:
Keith Higgins, Joel Carlson, Larry Lesane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bratton v. Curry et al
as 3:2008cv02788
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bratton
Defendant:
Ben Curry, W. Martinus, B. R. Peoples and others
3rd Party Defendant:
Greg Sheffield
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
J. G. Boswell Tomato Company - Kern, LLC v. Private Label Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2008at00246
Defendant:
Private Label Foods, Inc., Private Label Foods of Rochester, Inc. and Private Label Foods of Rochester, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J. G. Boswell Tomato Company - Kern, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hall v. Curry et al
as 5:2007cv03580
Petitioner:
Richard Gary Hall
Respondent:
Ben Curry, W. A. Cohen, J. Aboytes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haney v. Adams et al
as 1:2007cv01104
Plaintiff:
Monte Haney
Defendant:
Darrel G Adams, T. Heing, L - Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haney v. Adams et al
as 2:2007cv01322
Plaintiff:
Monte Haney
Defendant:
Darrel G Adams, T. Heing, L - Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Curry et al
as 5:2007cv03233
Plaintiff:
Richard Gary Hall
Defendant:
Ben Curry, J. C. Sisk, W. A. Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
