Cases 1 - 10 of 115
MCCUSKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017cv02235
Plaintiff:
EDWARD G. MCCUSKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FT. DEVENS FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Rinaldi v. USA, et al
as 16-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RINALDI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARRELL WATTS, Central Office, BRYAN A. BLEDSOE and others
Mabry v. Grondolsky
as 3:2013cv01258
Petitioner:
James Mabry
Respondent:
J. Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rinaldi v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00450
Plaintiff:
Michael Rinaldi
Defendant:
United States of America, Harrell Watts, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hitham Abuhouran v. J. Grondolsky
as 11-3081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HITHAM ABUHOURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. GRONDOLSKY
Steven Hoffenberg v. Renee Bumb, et al
as 11-1268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN JUDE HOFFENBERG, acting to pay COURT ORDERED restitution and fines above $475 million to State pension funds for over 200,000 RESTITUTION INVESTOR VICTIMS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. GRONDOLSKY, RICHARD HERBIK, ROBIN HOOD and others
Angel Pinet v. USA, et al
as 10-3740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL MANUEL PINET
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and J. GRONDOLSKY, Warden, FCI at Fort Dix
YOUNG v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 2:2010cv03974
Petitioner:
JOSEPH B. YOUNG
Respondent:
J. GRONDOLSKY and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kenneth Brown v. J. Grondolsky
as 10-3145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH L. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. GRONDOLSKY
Steven Hoffenberg v. J. Grondolsky, et al
as 10-2346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN JUDE HOFFENBERG
Defendant - Appellee:
J. GRONDOLSKY, RICHARD HERBIK, ROBIN HOOD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
