Cases 1 - 8 of 8
William Cummings v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
Defendant:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, Deputy Superintendent, CHRISTOPHER SYMONS, Deputy Superintendent, C.O. LUKE ERDMAN and others
Mendez Firpo v. Barberry Rose Management Company Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05303
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Mendez Firpo
Defendant:
Barberry Rose Management Company Inc. doing business as Howal Management Corp., STF 247 Audubon Avenue Holding LLC., Arm Maint Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cummings v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Christopher Symons, C.O. Luke Erdman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pineda v. Barberry Rose Management Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03762
Defendant:
BSF 574 West 161st Street Holding LLC, 1520-26 St. Nicholas Holding LLC, Arm Maint. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Pineda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lewis v. Meudt et al
as 4:2021cv00556
Defendant:
Cpl. K. Howal, Officer E. Meudt and Bill Waybourn
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez et al v. Barberry Rose Management Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06744
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Simone and Blanca Martinez
Defendant:
BSF Inwood Holding LLC, LJJ Manager LLC, Barberry Rose Management Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jamison v. Varano et al
as 1:2012cv01500
Plaintiff:
Dashaun Jamison
Defendant:
David A. Varano, R Ellett, Robert McMillian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2010cv02622
Plaintiff:
Andre Jacobs
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office, Jeffery A. Beard, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
