Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hartley v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 2:2017cv00199
Plaintiff:
Dallas J Hartley, Jr
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners and Carter County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cate, et al
as 2:2014cv02514
Plaintiff:
Gregory David Johnson
Defendant:
M Cate and J. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nawabi v. Cates et al
as 1:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
Idris Nawabi
Defendant:
Cates, L. Zamora, J. Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2012cv01437
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Thomas
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Hartley, R. Ndoh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedro Honesto v. Arnold Schwarzeneggar, et al
as 11-16832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO HONESTO, AKA Peter J. Honesto
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, Governor, J. HARTLEY, Warden and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Peter Honesto v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 11-15072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER J. HONESTO, AKA Pedro Honesto
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, E. BROWN, Jr., J. HARTLEY and others
Thomas v. Goumas et al
as 1:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Thomas
Defendant:
J. Goumas, B. Desilagua, N. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Honesto v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2010cv05691
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Honesto
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, E. Brown, Jr., J. Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Hartley, et al.
as 1:2010cv02260
Plaintiff:
Robert E Thompson
Defendant:
J. Hartley, R. Ndoh, L Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Shehata v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 10-56799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK F. SHEHATA
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Sec'y Dept of Correc., M. POULOS, Warden, CIM, J. HARTLEY, Warden, ASP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
