Cases 1 - 7 of 7
HIGGINS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv03269
Defendant:
COMMISIONER, CORIZON LLC and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
BRIAN J. HIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HIGGINS v. CORIZON INC et al
as 1:2017cv02802
Defendant:
CORIZON INC, CORIZON LLC and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
BRIAN J. HIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shah et al v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00815
Plaintiff:
Shah, Local 1500 UFCW, Rajesh M Shah and others
Defendant:
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Betsy J Bernard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Central Laborers' Pension Fund et al v. Southeastern Construction Inc et al
as 3:2011cv03044
Plaintiff:
Central Laborers' Pension Fund , Central Laborers' Annuity Fund , North Central Laborers' Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Southeastern Construction Inc and Christopher J Higgins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Higgins v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv11849
Plaintiff:
Tiffany J. Higgins
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT (ERISA) LITIGATION
as 1:2009ml06000
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 719 PENSION FUND, PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 719 PENSION FUND, PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 719 PENSION FUND and others
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
HAYS v. DVORAK et al
as 1:2008cv01108
Plaintiff:
JAMES HAYS, JAMES HAYS and JAMES HAYS
Defendant:
DAVID C. DVORAK, STUART M. ESSIG, LARRY C. GLASSCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
