Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Ryokan College v. California Board of Psychology et al
as 2:2017at00929
Plaintiff:
Ryokan College
Defendant:
California Board of Psychology, Stephen Phillips, Nicole J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ryokan College v. California Board of Psychology et al
as 2:2017cv01882
Plaintiff:
Ryokan College
Defendant:
California Board of Psychology , Stephen Phillips , Nicole J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Canada v. Jones
as 2:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Canada
Defendant:
J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016at00049
Plaintiff:
LaKeith LeRoy McCoy
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Kim Holland, J. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
McCoy v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
LaKeith LeRoy McCoy
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Kim Holland, J Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Larios v. Lunardi, et al
as 2:2015cv02451
Plaintiff:
Timothy Larios
Defendant:
Scott Lunardi, Mel Hutsell, T. A. Garr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Lopez et al
as 1:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
Robert Bishop
Defendant:
Raul Lopez, J. Germond, C. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Powell v. Barron et al
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Matthew Powell
Defendant:
M. Barron, R. Goings, I. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Cogdell, et al.
as 2:2014cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gray
Defendant:
B. Cogdell, F. Gardner, D.L. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Merced Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv01990
Plaintiff:
Leonard J. Jones
Defendant:
Merced Police Department and Mejia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
