Cases 1 - 10 of 15
LANE v. LEONARD S. FIORE, INC., SELECTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
as 3:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY J. LANE
Defendant:
LEONARD S. FIORE, INC., SELECTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
CARMON v. LANE et al
as 5:2019cv06113
Petitioner:
SHALAMAR CARMON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and J. LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCGLINCHEY v. S.C.I. FAYETTE et al
as 2:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MCGLINCHEY
Defendant:
S.C.I. FAYETTE, JOHN UNKNOWN, BRIAN V. COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BETHA v. LANE et al
as 2:2017cv03078
Petitioner:
DARRELL R. BETHA
Respondent:
J. LANE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
INGRAM v. MILLER et al
as 2:2016cv01191
Plaintiff:
STEVEN INGRAM
Defendant:
MILLER and J. LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Lane et al
as 1:2015cv02195
Petitioner:
Greg Lee
Respondent:
J. Lane and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DURKIN v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2015cv04356
Petitioner:
JOSEPH DURKIN
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. WENEROWICZ, J. LANE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOGGS v. SIVERA et al
as 2:2015cv01336
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY K. BOGGS
Defendant:
SIVERA, TERRA, G. ONDREJLKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv05762
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. BEARD, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. FOX
as 2:2014cv05476
Plaintiff:
DAVON R. HAYES
Defendant:
CRYSTAL L. FOX, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, J. LANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
