Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Dolberry v. Martin et al
as 1:2013cv08294
Plaintiff:
Andre Dolberry
Defendant:
J. Martin and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dolberry et al v. Martin et al
as 1:2013cv08291
Plaintiff:
Andre Dolberry, Daquan Watkins and Kadeem Young
Defendant:
J. Martin and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeder v. Lavalley et al
as 9:2011cv00505
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Defendant:
Thomas Lavalley, Facteau, Lacy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Franczyk et al
as 6:2011cv06104
Plaintiff:
Melzar Ti-Shawn Wilkins
Defendant:
Kelly Herkey, Mark L. Kalinowski, Jodi Ludemann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2010cv00719
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Woods
Defendant:
City of Buffalo, Buffalo Police Department, Joseph J. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bumpus v. Martin et al
as 6:2010cv06230
Plaintiff:
James Bumpus
Defendant:
Dennis J. Martin, Taylor Roberts and Jascqueline Levitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Fischer et al
as 9:2009cv01152
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Donald Selsky, Joseph Bellnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemming v. Fischer et al
as 6:2009cv06457
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Donald Selsky, Joseph Bellnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
G&C Food Distributors & Brokers, Inc. v. A.J. Martin, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00917
Plaintiff:
G&C Food Distributors & Brokers, Inc.
Defendant:
A.J. Martin, Inc., Sysco Boston LLC and Albert J. Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith v. Head et al
as 9:2009cv00119
Plaintiff:
Donald Smith
Defendant:
Gail Head, Dennis McElory, Doirs Bartletts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
