Cases 1 - 10 of 85
PAULSEN v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Joshua Benjamin Paulsen
Defendant:
O'Malley J. Martin
OLIVER v. ARAMARK FOOD INC. et al
as 5:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
BRIAN C. OLIVER
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD INC., ARAMARK SUPERVISOR TASSONE, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY et al v. ROYAL SOVEREIGN INTERNATIONAL INC.
as 3:2021cv00052
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, BRIAN J. MARTIN and TINA L. MARTIN
Defendant:
ROYAL SOVEREIGN INTERNATIONAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
John J. Martin Esquire v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00388
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Enerco Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John J. Martin Esquire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06160
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. MARTIN and JUDY J. MARTIN
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00544
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01604
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
MARTIN v. HARPER
as 2:2018cv00837
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. MARTIN
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00636
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00459
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
