Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Walton v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00174
Petitioner:
Tyrone Earl Walton
Respondent:
J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jokinen v. Oregon Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Dylan Aaron Jokinen
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Superintendent J. Miller, SGT M. Dinucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahueron v. Miller et al
as 2:2022cv01550
Plaintiff:
Allieanna Charleyn Mahueron
Defendant:
J. Miller, Lt. Kenyon, Lt. Russel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahueron v. Miller
as 2:2022cv01554
Petitioner:
Allieanna Charleyn Mahueron
Respondent:
J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Capps et al
as 2:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
Ernie Perez
Defendant:
Joe Capps, J. Miller, J. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aplin v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Colby Aplin
Defendant:
B. Smith, Dewald, Fraser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv01259
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Moore
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Oregon Dept of Corrections, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremiah v. Cain et al
as 2:2021cv00618
Defendant:
Rowley, John Doe, Collette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Jeremiah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv02052
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group, Inc,, Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Beverly J Miller, Dwyn E. Miller and Beverly J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Segura v. Kast et al
as 6:2020cv01400
Defendant:
Sgt. Jochums, Sheriff Joe Kast, Deputy Onerdo and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Segura, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
