Cases 1 - 10 of 24
v. United States of America
as 1:2024at00173
Defendant:
United States of America
Trustee:
Dolores J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Murphy v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Dolores J. Murphy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) TerVeer v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Justin Ryan TerVeer
Defendant:
Gena Jones, Howard E. Moseley, Brunner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Joe Long v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv05054
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, V. Jones and J. Murphy
Plaintiff:
William Joe Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyonel Love El et al v. The Estate of Murray Rothstein et al
as 2:2019cv10570
Defendant:
The Estate of Murray Rothstein, Gaston Mooney, National Amusements and others
Plaintiff:
Lyonel Love El, Isaiah J. Murphy and Lyonel Love El doing business as National Morrish Hebrew Israelite Constitutional Affairs a Bubsidiary of the Moorish Science Temple of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Thomas J. Murphy v. Daniel Paramo
as 5:2018cv00117
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Murphy
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo
Gash v. Murphy et al
as 3:2016cv00921
Plaintiff:
Roy Davis Gash
Defendant:
Bion J Murphy, Jr, Alan Zimmer and DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DefensTech International, Inc. v. C & W Murphy and Associates et al
as 8:2014cv00277
Defendant:
C & W Murphy and Associates and William J Murphy
Plaintiff:
DefensTech International, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
