Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Terrell v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2010cv01844
Plaintiff:
Willie James Terrell, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Atlanta Judicial Circuit, Fulton County Law Library and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Pennington et al
as 1:2009cv03345
Plaintiff:
Willie James Terrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard J. Pennington, Cerelyn J. Davis, W. Harris, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Terrell v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2009cv02385
Plaintiff:
Willie James Terrell, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Richard J. Pennington, Darrell D. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Terrell v. Pennington et al
as 1:2009cv02264
Plaintiff:
Willie James Terrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard J. Pennington and City of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Williams v. The City of Atlanta, Georgia et al
as 1:2008cv02974
Plaintiff:
Mingus Williams and Mingus Williams
Defendant:
The City of Atlanta, Georgia, The City of Atlanta, Georgia, The City of Atlanta, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephens v. Fisher et al
as 1:2007cv02528
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Stephens
Defendant:
Matthew Fisher, Supervisor (agent 73478), Air Tran Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Ghavami v. Jessup et al
as 1:2007cv02467
Plaintiff:
Shahin Ghavami
Defendant:
Steven Jessup, John Doe, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
