Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Palya v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 8:2016cv03669
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Palya, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, J. Philip Morgan and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Glennon et al
as 1:2016cv02160
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lloyd
Defendant:
Garrett Glennon and J. Philip Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-Amin et al v. Moyer et al
as 1:2016cv01349
Plaintiff:
M. Abdullah El-Amin, Anthony Lloyd and Joshue Zembower
Defendant:
Stephen T. Moyer, J. Philip Morgan, Contah Nimely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds v. State Of Maryland
as 8:2015cv02130
Petitioner:
Brad K. Edmonds
Respondent:
J. Philip Morgan and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Henson, Jr. v. Bradley Wilt
as 15-6896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. HENSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRADLEY WILT, WALTER ISER, BRIAN IAMES and others
Guy Shannon, Jr. v. Department of Public Safety
as 15-6500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUY G. SHANNON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, WARDEN J. PHILIP MORGAN and others
:
Jones v. Morgan et al
as 1:2014cv02547
Petitioner:
Stephen B. Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
J. Philip Morgan and Douglas F. Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Morgan et al
as 8:2014cv02253
Plaintiff:
Jermain Green
Defendant:
J. Philip Morgan and Maryland Correctional Training Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Korey Putney v. R. Likin
as 14-6882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KOREY PUTNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
R. LIKIN, Correctional Officer, J. PHILIP MORGAN, Warden, S. A. WILSON, Correctional Officer and others
Hardy v. Morgan et al
as 1:2014cv00354
Petitioner:
Michael Antonio Hardy
Respondent:
J. Philip Morgan and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
