Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Leon Johnson v. F. Duty
as 24-6197
Plaintiff:
LEON JERMAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
F. DUTY, sued in individual capacity, J. R. MASSINGILL, sued in individual capacity, J. R. ADAMS and others
Leon Johnson v. F. Duty
as 24-6193
Plaintiff:
LEON JERMAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
F. DUTY, J. R. MASSINGILL, J. SHEPHERD, sued in their individual capacities and others
Durwin Bonds, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6151
Plaintiff:
DURWIN EVANT BONDS, JR.
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director VA Dept. of Corrections, RICK WHITE, Warden of Red Onion State Prison, K. ALMARADE, Food Service ROSP and others
Jones v. White et al
as 7:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Tehgrain Jamal Jones
Defendant:
Rick White, C. King, L. Jessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Duty et al
as 7:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Leon Johnson
Defendant:
F. Duty, B. Maze, J. R. Massingill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Adams et al
as 7:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Leon Johnson
Defendant:
J.R. Adams, F. Duty, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Maze et al
as 7:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Leon Johnson
Defendant:
B. Maze, J. R. Massingill, J. Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Moyler, Jr. v. D. Williams
as 21-6939
Defendant:
HAROLD CLARKE, SERGEANT J. R. MASSINGILL, MELISSA WELCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER D. WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS MOYLER, JR.
Carter v. Ramey et al
as 7:2021cv00348
Defendant:
A. Duncan, Fleming, #1 Doe Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00743
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David Robinson, McReynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dean Walker and Antonio Deon Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
