Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND, et al., v. J. RIHL, INC.
as 1:2014mc00008
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND, et al.,
Defendant:
J. RIHL, INC.
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitter National Pension Fund et al. v. J Rihl Inc.
as 1:2014mc00104
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitter National Pension Fund
Defendant:
J Rihl Inc.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. J. Rihl, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01062
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and Trustees of the International Training Fund
Defendant:
J. Rihl, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HUNTER ROBERTS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC v. J. RIHL, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv07751
Plaintiff:
HUNTER ROBERTS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
J. RIHL, INC., CITY MECHANICAL, INC., JOHN B. RIHL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE OF JOHN H. DZWIL v. J. RIHL, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06476
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE OF JOHN H. DZWIL
Defendant:
J. RIHL, INC., HUNTER ROBERTS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
NGM INSURANCE COMPANY v. J. RIHL, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv06018
Plaintiff:
NGM INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
J. RIHL, INC., CITY MECHANICAL, INC., NORTH CHURCH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
J. RIHL, INC. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2011cv06379
Plaintiff:
J. RIHL, INC.
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J. RIHL, INC. v. BOFINGER et al
as 2:2010cv01005
Plaintiff:
J. RIHL, INC.
Defendant:
THOMAS BOFINGER and BOFINGER PLUMBING CONTRACTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
