Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Perez v. Hidalgo County Constable Pct. 4 et al
as 7:2014cv00783
Defendant:
Hidalgo County Constable Pct. 4, Eddie Guerra , Juan J. Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramos, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 5:2014cv00502
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laura Posadas, Dan J. Ramos and Tina Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Thompson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00998
Plaintiff:
Dwayne L. Thompson
Defendant:
The City of New York , New York City Police Department, Edward Washa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Del Villar-Rosario v. Popular Bank, Inc et al
as 3:2011cv02061
Plaintiff:
Euripides Del Villar-Rosario
Defendant:
Popular Bank, Inc, George Eduardo Martinez-Landron, Richard L. Carrion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv02051
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officers John Does 1-2 and Police Officer Brian J. Ramos
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv02302
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brown
Defendant:
The City of New York, Brian J. Ramos and John Does #1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia-Valencia v. Toledo-Davila et al
as 3:2007cv01904
Plaintiff:
Enrique Garcia-Valencia
Defendant:
Pedro Toledo-Davila, Jose J. Ramos-Gonzalez, Angel R. Marte-Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Santana-Castro et al v. Toledo-Davila et al
as 3:2007cv01826
Plaintiff:
Charles Santana-Castro, Charles Santana-Castro, Felix Santana-Carmona and others
Defendant:
Pedro Toledo-Davila, Jose J. Ramos-Gonzalez, Jose Lebron-Alicea and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
