Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Landis v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2021cv00244
Defendant:
M. Condit, J. Konkle, J. Sienkiewicz and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jordon v. Ebbert et al
as 4:2019cv01472
Defendant:
Mr. Watson, K. Sorce, D. Andrew Edringer and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen L. Jordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Landis v. Wilson et al
as 1:2019cv01301
Defendant:
J. Enigk, J. Konkle, Ian Connors and others
Debtor In Possession:
NRP M. Barner
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. Ebbert et al
as 4:2019cv00997
Defendant:
Lammer, Mr. B. Chappell, Darrin Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv00287
Defendant:
Hugh Hurwitz, The Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Ray Ormond and others
Plaintiff:
David Lee Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2018cv02456
Defendant:
Warden Douglas K. White, David J Ebbert, J. Ray Ormond and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pagan et al v. White et al
as 1:2018cv02317
Defendant:
Warden Douglas K. White and J. Ray Ormond
Plaintiff:
Others Similarly Situated, Edwin Michael Brown, Angel M. Pagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HENRY v. ORMOND et al
as 2:2017cv00362
Petitioner:
ANDRE HENRY
Respondent:
J. RAY ORMOND and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
