Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pollard, Donald et al v. Johnson, Sr., John et al
as 3:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Donald Pollard, Bonnie Pollard, James Baird and others
Defendant:
John Johnson, Sr., George W. Thompson, William J. Stone and others
Amicus Curiae:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv50056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Anderson v. Batsel et al
as 3:2022cv01014
Plaintiff:
Julius Anderson
Defendant:
Scott Batsel and J Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Thews et al
as 3:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
William Rose, William J Ross and Rose-el
Defendant:
Diane Thews, Nancy Marthakiss, Ron Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. COOK MEDICAL LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03621
Plaintiff:
CATHY J. STONE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Products Liability
Smith v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv01154
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Robbie Johnson, Greg Gossett, Dave Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00612
Plaintiff:
Margaret J Stone and Mickey W Stone
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv50156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HECKING v. NEW HAMPSHIRE CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES et al
as 1:2013cv00565
Defendant:
ATTY. MS. "PAT", MS. KELLY AYOTTE, MS. KATHRYN BARGER and others
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN DIRCK HECKING
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
