Cases 1 - 10 of 28,224
Thiels v. Berger et al
as 4:2024cv01668
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thiels
Defendant:
William J. Berger, Robert L. Lane, Nora Mead Brownell and others
O'Bell et al v. Varsity Spirit, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Eric J O'Bell, Sherri Z O'Bell and Olivia E O'Bell
Defendant:
Varsity Spirit, LLC and Universal Cheerleaders Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Pools123 Houston LLC v. Mehrman et al
as 4:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Pools123 Houston LLC
Defendant:
John J. Mehrman, Pools123 Texas LLC, Pools123 Waco LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
United States of America v. Moore
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cassidy J. Moore
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Nash v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01661
Plaintiff:
Lorelei Nash
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Castro v. Doe
as 24-10387
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro, also known as J. A. Castro
Defendant:
John Doe 1, also known as Chetsford, John Doe 2, Save America PAC and others
Liberty Personal Insurance Co v. Stanley et al
as 2:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Liberty Personal Insurance Co
Defendant:
William P. Stanley, Billie J. Courville and Wells Fargo Bank N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01637
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
