Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Flagg v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Andrea Duhreal Flagg and Andre D. Flagg-El
Defendant:
W.G. Jones, James Watson, Randall Beckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Compton et al
as 2:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Devon Johnson
Defendant:
K. Compton, T. Tremblay, J. Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flagg v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00767
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Flagg and Andre D. Flagg-El
Defendant:
W.G. Jones, James Watson, Randall Beckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Watson et al
as 3:2020cv01117
Defendant:
C Tanner, N. Bernard, J. Merritt and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Andrew Ford, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Spivey et al
as 3:2020cv00101
Defendant:
J. Watson and Matthew Spivey
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Culver et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00040
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Jason Smoak, Ms. Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 6:2018cv00842
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dewayne Booth
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Jefferson S Dunn, J Watson and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00419
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dewayne Booth
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn, J. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Watson v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 11-14692
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE J. WATSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Telamy v. Armor Correctional Health Service et al
as 0:2011cv62066
Plaintiff:
Paulius Telamy
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Service, Veronica Edwards, Ora J. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
