Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Bass v. Wise et al
as 6:2011cv01050
Plaintiff:
Tommy Bass
Defendant:
D J Wise and White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Dunson et al
as 2:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Owen Lamar Cooper, Sr
Defendant:
Ronald Floyd Dunson, Truman Lamar Dunson, Teresa Lynn Dunson Griffin and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Allen et al
as 4:2010cv02747
Plaintiff:
James Heard
Defendant:
Richard Allen, David J. Wise, Mary C. Carter and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Wise et al
as 2:2010cv02653
Petitioner:
Antonio Nichols
Respondent:
D J Wise and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Layton v. Wise et al
as 2:2010cv02397
Petitioner:
Douglas William Layton, Jr.
Respondent:
David J. Wise and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eckles v. Wise et al
as 3:2010cv02173
Petitioner:
Donnie Lee Eckles
Respondent:
D J Wise and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DeBruce v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2010cv00668
Petitioner:
Dennis Lamar DeBruce
Respondent:
Alabama, State of, David J. Wise and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Allen et al
as 2:2009cv02544
Petitioner:
Danny L. Smith
Respondent:
Richard F. Allen, David J. Wise, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Wise et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2009cv00987
Plaintiff:
William Wesley Wood
Defendant:
David J. Wise and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Wise et al (INMATE3)
as 1:2009cv00987
Plaintiff:
William Wesley Wood
Defendant:
David J. Wise and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
