Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Students for Life of America et al v. Gillespie et al
as 1:2024cv11928
Plaintiff:
DuPage Precision Products, Matthew Yonke, Jaclyn Cornell and others
Defendant:
Ann Gillespie, Kwame Raoul and J.B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love EL v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv11802
Defendant:
Cedric Giles and J.B. Pritzker
Plaintiff:
Lyonel Love EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Love EL v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv11803
Defendant:
Brandon Johnson and Governor J.B. Pritzker
Plaintiff:
Lyonel Love EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rochelle Maly, et al v. J.B. Pritzker, et al
as 24-3024
Defendant:
CASANDRA B. WATSON, JACK VRETT, CATHERINE S. MCCRORY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. STIRN, ROCHELLE M. MALY and JENEANE L. FERGUSON
Rochelle Maly, et al v. J.B. Pritzker, et al
as 24-2979
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. STIRN, ROCHELLE M. MALY and JENEANE L. FERGUSON
Defendant:
JACK VRETT, J.B. PRITZKER, in his official capacity as Governor, CATHERINE S. MCCRORY and others
Eugene N. Arnold, III v. Kim Foxx, et al
as 24-2965
Plaintiff:
EUGENE N. ARNOLD, III
Defendant:
KIMBERLY M. FOXX, COOK COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY OFFICE, J.B. PRITZKER and others
Eugene Arnold, III v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 24-2831
Defendant:
SERGEANT BUFFORD, THOMAS J. DART, KWAME RAOUL and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE N. ARNOLD, III
Robinson et al v. J.B. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv10068
Plaintiff:
zviad dzamashvili and James Robinson
Defendant:
J.B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Eugene Arnold, III v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 24-2758
Defendant:
SERGEANT BUFFORD, KWAME RAOUL, THOMAS J. DART and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE N. ARNOLD, III
Don Lippert, et al v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 24-2333
Defendant:
STEVEN BOWMAN, J.B. PRITZKER and LATOYA HUGHES
Plaintiff:
LEWIS RICE, JOHN RUFFIN, DEBRA PATTISON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
