Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carter v. Macy's et al
as 3:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carter
Defendant:
Macy's, Ann Scanlon, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. American Express et al
as 1:2021cv09803
Plaintiff:
Shaun Rushing
Defendant:
American Express, Visa, MasterCard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. United States et al
as 1:2017cv01245
Plaintiff:
Kevin P. Smith
Defendant:
United States, Westwego Police, Big L's Building Materials and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States, et al
as 1:2017cv01226
Plaintiff:
Kevin P. Smith
Defendant:
United States, Westwego Police, Big L's Building Materials and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
L&M Direct LLC v. Aldo Group Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv07020
Plaintiff:
L&M Direct LLC
Defendant:
Aldo Group Inc. , J.C. Penny Corporation, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Portelos et al v. J.C. Penny Company, Inc.
as 2:2013cv04774
Defendant:
J.C. Penny Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marina Aivaliotis and Maria Portelos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mattei v. J.C. Penny Corporation, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04391
Defendant:
J.C. Penny Corporation, Inc. and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Margarita Mattei
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Turkmenoglu v. J.C. Penny Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03290
Plaintiff:
Diana Turkmenoglu
Defendant:
J.C. Penny Company, Inc. , John Doe, James Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Martin v. J.C. Penny Corporation, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01985
Defendant:
Kenny Fingers, J.C. Penny Corporation, Inc. and Jane Doe
Being Male Employees Of JC Penny Company, Inc. Who Participated In The Acts Complained Of Herein:
John Does 1-2
Plaintiff:
Yavon Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
