Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Syed v. Chitic et al
as 2:2018cv00475
Defendant:
J.F. Freight Company, Inc., Roadrunner Express, Inc., Petru Chitic and others
Plaintiff:
Hawa Syed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASTRO v. FCC TERRE HAUTE BLUE/GOLD PROGRAM et al
as 2:2014cv00042
Defendant:
J.F. CARAWAY, FCC TERRE HAUTE BLUE/GOLD PROGRAM and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
JUAN BENITO CASTRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LARD v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2014cv00038
Respondent:
J.F. CARAWAY and J. OLIVER
Petitioner:
ELLIS JEROME LARD, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCFARLAND v. CARAWAY
as 2:2013cv00331
Respondent:
J.F. CARAWAY
Petitioner:
DAVID MCFARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. CARAWAY
as 2:2013cv00322
Respondent:
J.F. CARAWAY
Petitioner:
ARTHUR JONES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALEXANDER v. J.F. CARAWAY, WARDEN
as 2:2013cv00296
Petitioner:
ANTHONY ALEXANDER
Respondent:
J.F. CARAWAY, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHERMAN, JR. v. J.F. CARAWAY, WARDEN
as 2:2013cv00292
Respondent:
J.F. CARAWAY, WARDEN
Petitioner:
RAYMOND H. SHERMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PAUL v. SAWYER et al
as 2:2013cv00268
Defendant:
BAYLESS, J.F. CARAWAY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY PAUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FERNANDO v. CONWAY et al
as 2:2013cv00262
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant:
H.G. CHURGH, J.F. CONWAY, J. OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GLOVER v. CARAWAY
as 2:2013cv00215
Respondent:
J.F. CARAWAY
Petitioner:
FRED M GLOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
