Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Sullivan et al v. Machut et al
as 1:2008cv05973
Plaintiff:
James T. Sullivan, James T. Sullivan, James T. Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Philip S. Machut, Phimac Sprinklers, Inc. and J.M. Irrigation, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thebeau v. J.M. Marschuetz Construction Co.
as 4:2008cv01138
Defendant:
J.M. Marschuetz Construction Co.
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Thebeau
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
J.M. Huber Corporation et al v. Rogers et al
as 5:2008cv00089
Plaintiff:
J.M. Huber Corporation, J.M. Huber Corporation, J.M. Huber Corporation and others
Defendant:
Rebecca A. Rogers, Jack A. Rogers, Jr. and Lucy H. Rogers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trustees Of The District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance And Annuity Funds v. J.M. Charles Painting Corp.
as 7:2008cv00187
Plaintiff:
Trustees Of The District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance And Annuity Funds
Defendant:
J.M. Charles Painting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees Of The District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance And Annuity Funds v. J.M. Painting Constractors Inc.
as 7:2007cv06947
Plaintiff:
Trustees Of The District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance And Annuity Funds
Defendant:
J.M. Painting Constractors Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Board of Trustees of the Southern California Glaziers Architechtural Metal and Glass Workers Health and Welfare Trust et al v. J.M. Glass Service
as 2:2007cv01989
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Southern California Glaziers Architechtural Metal and Glass Workers Health and Welfare Trust, Board of Trustees of the Southern California Glaziers Architechtural Metal and Glass Workers Health and Welfare Trust, Board of Trustees of the Southern California Glaziers Architechtural Metal and Glass Workers Health and Welfare Trust and others
Defendant:
J.M. Glass Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
