Cases 1 - 10 of 28
M&T BANK v. ARSENIS et al
as 3:2024cv04561
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
M&T BANK v. ARSENIS et al
as 3:2023cv20637
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
M&T BANK v. CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS et al
as 3:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv20893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv07192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
STEINHARTER v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
as 3:2019cv06285
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
Plaintiff:
RIVKA STEINHARTER
FARZAN v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. et al
as 3:2019cv05156
Defendant:
STACY E. SPOHN, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
REZA FARZAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VERIZON EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE v. VALERIE O'CONNOR et al
as 3:2019cv04441
Plaintiff:
VERIZON EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE
Defendant:
VALERIE O'CONNOR, ALEXIS O'CONNOR, J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
KACHUR et al v. WMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2018cv15111
Defendant:
US BANK, N.A., ISSUING ENTITY TRUST J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST 2006-WMC4, DOES 1-100 INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff:
MARY J. KACHUR and PETER J. KACHUR
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
