Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Allan Groves v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Allan Groves, as Trustee for the 1435 Crescent Oak Trust and Allan Groves
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee on behalf of the Holders of the J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2006-WMC4 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-WMC4, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
KACHUR et al v. WMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2018cv15111
Defendant:
US BANK, N.A., ISSUING ENTITY TRUST J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST 2006-WMC4, DOES 1-100 INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff:
MARY J. KACHUR and PETER J. KACHUR
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Zapata v. U.S. Bank N.A., as Trustee, on behalf of the holders, of the J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2006-WMC4 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-WMC4
as 1:2018cv03053
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A., as Trustee, on behalf of the holders, of the J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2006-WMC4 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-WMC4
Plaintiff:
Maria Zapata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
WMC Mortgage, LLC v. JP Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2006-WMC4, by U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 0:2012cv03146
Plaintiff:
WMC Mortgage, LLC
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2006-WMC4, by U.S. Bank National Association
Plumbers' & Pipefitters' Local #562 Supplemental Plan & Trust et al v. J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation I et al
as 2:2008cv01713
Plaintiff:
Plumbers' & Pipefitters' Local #562 Supplemental Plan & Trust, Plumbers' & Pipefitters' Local #562 Supplemental Plan & Trust, Plumbers' & Pipefitters' Local #562 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation I, J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation I, J.P.Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2006-A1 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
