Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Ray, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Rayford, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MOBLEY et al v. A W CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv67169
Plaintiff:
JACK RAY MOBLEY and SHARON P MOBLEY
Defendant:
A W CHESTERTON COMPANY , BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC INC , CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAY v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv92789
Plaintiff:
ARENTON JACK RAY
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., A C & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RAY et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88533
Plaintiff:
JACK RAY and MARTHA J. RAY
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Mobley et al v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 0:2009cv01789
Plaintiff:
Jack Ray Mobley and Sharon P Mobley
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, Borg-Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCBRIDE et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66324
Plaintiff:
TOMMY GENE MCBRIDE, BOYCE P. MCCLANE, BETTY MCCLAIN and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
