Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BRAYBOY v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv04139
Petitioner:
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY
Respondent:
B. MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF JACK STOLLSTEIMER and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DELAWARE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Artis Carroll, Jr. v. Laura Williams, et al
as 23-2804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURA WILLIAMS, JACK STOLLSTEIMER, MICHELLE HENRY and others
Artis Carroll, Jr. v. Laura Williams, et al
as 23-2619
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURA WILLIAMS, JACK STOLLSTEIMER, MICHELLE HENRY and others
CARROL, JR. v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv02574
Petitioner:
A.C. and ARTIS C. CARROL, JR.
Respondent:
LAURA WILLIAMS, JACK STOLLSTEIMER, MICHELLE HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
THE ESTATE OF DANNY VALENTINE-SHABAZZ v. FLYNN et al
as 2:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF DANNY VALENTINE-SHABAZZ
Defendant:
JEFF FLYNN, ROBERT BUCCINI, CHRIS BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
BRAYBOY
as 2:2021cv05642
In Re:
RODRICK BRAYBOY
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JACK STOLLSTEIMER and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARROLL v. BRENNAN et al
as 2:2021cv05505
Petitioner:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MARY BRENNAN, CHARLENE M. LAPRESTE, PHILIP F. PISANI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CAMACHO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2021cv00239
Petitioner:
YORDANIE CAMACHO
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DELAWARE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, JACK STOLLSTEIMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STEWART v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY JACK STOLLSTEIMER et al
as 2:2020cv04005
Petitioner:
CARL THOMAS STEWART, JR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY JACK STOLLSTEIMER and WARDEN GWHCF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
