Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Sancho v. Jackson County, et al.
as 24-638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN ANTHONY SANCHO
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKSON COUNTY, DAVID L. DALTON, BRADY BJORKLAND and others
Sancho v. Jackson County, et al.
as 24-447
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JUAN ANTHONY SANCHO
Defendant / Appellant:
JACKSON COUNTY, an Oregon governmental entity, DAVID L. DALTON, in his individual and official capacity as a deputy employed by Jackson County Sheriff's Department, BRADY BJORKLAND, in his individual and official capacity as a deputy employed by Jackson County Sheriff's Department and others
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL ROKITA v. JACKSON COUNTY SCHNECK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL D/B/A SCHNECK MEDICAL CENTER
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL ROKITA
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY SCHNECK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL D/B/A SCHNECK MEDICAL CENTER
Jackson County, Missouri v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2023cv04531
Plaintiff:
Jackson County, Missouri
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. and others
In Re:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
as 2:2023md03080
In Re:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Defendant:
EVERNORTH HEALTH INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
HON. JOSEPH A. DICKSON
Plaintiff:
THE STATE OF MONTANA, EX. REL., THE STATE OF KANSAS EX. REL., TIMOTHY GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jackson County, Missouri v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as MOW/4:23-CV-00206
Plaintiff:
Jackson County, Missouri
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Bay County, Florida et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
BAY COUNTY FLORIDA, CALHOUN COUNTY FLORIDA, CITY OF NICEVILLE FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bay County, Florida et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Bay County, Florida, Calhoun County, Florida, City of Niceville, Florida and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc. and MCKINSEY AND COMPANY INC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Adams County, PA, et alIn re: Adams County, PA, et al
as 22-3653
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Petitioner:
ADAMS COUNTY, PA, LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP, PA, ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
