Cases 1 - 10 of 14
OAKLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32925
Plaintiff:
JACOB OAKLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OAKLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv25396
Plaintiff:
JACOB OAKLEY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oakley v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv03236
Plaintiff:
Jacob Oakley
Defendant:
(I) Estep, (I) Simpson, Estep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oakley v. Phillip
as 15-1469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB OAKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SHARON PHILLIPS, in her official and individual capacity
Oakley v. Zavaras, et al
as 12-1178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB OAKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, Executive Director and SUSAN JONES, Warden, CCF/CSP
Rueb, et al v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JOSEPH RUEB, AKA Justin K. Rueb, RAYMOND CAIN, JACOB OAKLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, EUGENE ATHERTON, DENNIS BURBANK and others
Rueb, et al v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JOSEPH RUEB, AKA Justin J. Rueb, AKA Justin Rueb and JACOB OAKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, EUGENE ATHERTON, DR. CRANDELL and others
Rueb, et al v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JOSEPH RUEB, RAYMOND CAIN, JACOB OAKLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, ROBERT ALLEN, EUGENE ATHERTON and others
Rueb et al v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv02725
Plaintiff:
Justin Rueb, Leroy Armijo, Rudy Ball and others
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Robert Allen, Eugene Atherton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rueb et al v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv02726
Plaintiff:
Justin Rueb and Jacob Oakley
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Eugene Atherton, Crandell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
