Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Hill #276083 v. Karth et al
as 2:2021cv00495
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jabarr Hill
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Brian D Karth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamal Hill v. State of Arizona
as 20-17288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL JABARR HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Jamal Hill v. State of Arizona, et al
as 20-17289
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL JABARR HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN D. KARTH, Clerk, United States District Courthouse - District of Arizona and STATE OF ARIZONA
Hill #276083 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2020cv01660
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jabarr Hill
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Brian D Karth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill #276083 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2020cv01525
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jabarr Hill
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamal Hill v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 20-16165
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMAL JABARR HILL, also named as: Jamal J Hill
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN, named as: Charles Ryan
Jamal Hill v. State of Arizona
as 20-15200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL JABARR HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Jamal Hill v. State of Arizona, et al
as 20-15204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL JABARR HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF FINE, Clerk of Superior Court at Jeff Fine Court Building, CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of Department of Corrections at Central Office, Phoenix, AZ and STATE OF ARIZONA
Jamal Hill v. David Shinn, et al
as 20-15193
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and WILLIAM GERARD MONTGOMERY
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMAL JABARR HILL
Jamal Hill v. State of Arizona
as 20-15194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL JABARR HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
