Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Laboy v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv04069
Plaintiff:
Hector Laboy
Defendant:
Austin Adams, Alexander Stuart, Jamar Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Little et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Allen Ford
Defendant:
R. Little, Major Ford, Jamar A. Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Kimble et al
as 1:2023cv16434
Plaintiff:
Jamar Rogers
Defendant:
Ronald Kimble, The City of Chicago and City of Chicago, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Leffler et al
as 4:2023cv04147
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan Leffler, J Johnson, Martin Matherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Drapper et al
as 1:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
Jamar Spencer
Defendant:
Lisa Drapper and Livingston County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03546
Plaintiff:
Tamytrys Haynes and Jamar Fizer
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Mead Johnson & Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McMullan v. Leffler et al
as 4:2023cv04089
Plaintiff:
Artez McMullan
Defendant:
Bryan Leffler, James Johnson, Paul Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Velez #7857 et al
as 1:2023cv03437
Plaintiff:
Jamar Rogers
Defendant:
P.O. Velez #7857, P.O. S. Carter #7425 and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Martin et al
as 1:2022cv05270
Plaintiff:
Jamar Rogers
Defendant:
Clifford Martin, Gerald Jones, Kameisha Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. Luster et al
as 4:2022cv04121
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wade
Defendant:
Mark Luster, Jamar Range, Roy Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
