Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Preston v. Green Bankshares, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00925
Plaintiff:
G. Kline Preston, IV
Defendant:
Green Bankshares, Inc. , James E. Adams , Stephen M. Rownd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. James Adam
as 11-1418
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES R. ADAMS, a/k/a James Leion Adams, a/k/a Speed Adams, a/k/a She Adams, a/k/a Terrence Unt, a/k/a Ancil Barnett, a/k/a Ansel Barnett, a/k/a Edward Hanp, a/k/a John Cullen Lewis
Molnar v. Green Bankshares, Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Brian Molnar
Defendant:
Green Bankshares, Inc, R Stan Puckett, Stephen M Rownd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Burgraff v. Green Bankshares, Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00253
Plaintiff:
Bill Burgraff
Defendant:
Green Bankshares, Inc, James E Adams, Stephen M Rownd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3rd_pty_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
James R. Adams v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-77628
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
James R. Adams
Jame E. Adams v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-77324
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Jame E. Adams
Franz Schleicher, et al v. Gary Wendt, et al
as 09-2154
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANZ SCHLEICHER, HERB LANESE and DENNIS SMITH
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY C. WENDT, WILLIAM J. SHEA, CHARLES B. CHOKEL and others
Gary Wendt, et al v. Franz Schleicher, et al
as 09-8017
Petitioner:
GARY C. WENDT, WILLIAM J. SHEA, CHARLES B. CHOKEL and others
Respondent:
FRANZ SCHLEICHER, HERB LANESE and DENNIS SMITH
James L. Adams v. A.p. Green Industries Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-63769
Defendant:
A.p. Green Industries Inc
Plaintiff:
James L. Adams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
