Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Nancy Fiedler et al v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv07065
Plaintiff:
Nancy Fiedler, Matthew Guiney, Olga Faynshteyn and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
James Edward Adams, Jr. et al v. Russell Vernon Grogan
as 5:2020cv00243
Plaintiff:
James Edward Adams, Jr. and Detrick Adams
Defendant:
Russell Vernon Grogan and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Adams v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 3:2018cv00610
Plaintiff:
James B. Adams
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruce D. Copeland v. Harold C. Siler et al
as 2:2016cv08864
Defendant:
James E. Adams, Timothy M. Adams, Adams Construction and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce D. Copeland
Adams v. U.S.CA California Judicial Council
as 4:2016cv00917
Plaintiff:
James D. Adams
Defendant:
U.S.CA California Judicial Council
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pauline St. Jean et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06068
Plaintiff:
James E. Adams, Shirley Adams, Antonio Aguayo and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Adams v. Santa Clara Co. Sheriffs Department of Elmwood Corrections
as 4:2014cv04483
Plaintiff:
James D. Adams
Defendant:
Santa Clara Co. Sheriffs Department of Elmwood Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ingram v. Stonestown Shopping Center, L.P. et al
as 3:2013cv02733
Plaintiff:
Barry G. Ingram
Defendant:
Stonestown Shopping Center, L.P., Rick Forster, James A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. City of San Jose California
as 4:2012cv06276
Plaintiff:
James D. Adams
Defendant:
City of San Jose California, Santa Clara County Superior Court, Rise Jones Pichon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
