Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Johnson v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00245
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: James M Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Nash et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00075
Plaintiff: James Earl Johnson
Defendant: Tim Nash and Kim Veers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Tollinson, et al
as 3:2016cv01943
Plaintiff: James C. Johnson
Defendant: (f/n/u) Tollinson, (f/n/u) Rudd and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sexton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00737
Petitioner: James Paris Johnson
Respondent: David Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Morrow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00430
Petitioner: James Lee Johnson
Respondent: Jim Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Morrow
as 3:2013cv00159
Petitioner: James Lee Johnson
Respondent: Jim Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Paul et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00017
Plaintiff: James M Johnson
Defendant: - Paul, Wayne Anderson and Penny Tester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Paul et al
as 3:2012cv00613
Plaintiff: James M Johnson
Defendant: - Paul, Wayne Anderson and Penny Tester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00944
Petitioner: James Edward Johnson, Jr.
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Luttrell
as 2:2006cv02822
Plaintiff: James E. Johnson
Defendant: Mark Luttrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?